Explore the practice of co-reviewing in scientific peer review through a 23-minute webinar featuring Dr. Nancy Grimm and Dr. Amalia Handler. Learn about the differences between regular reviewing and co-reviewing, the unique learning opportunities it provides compared to classroom experiences, and the benefits for authors receiving co-reviews. Discover potential challenges in the co-reviewing process and hear recommendations for participating in this collaborative approach to scientific evaluation. Gain insights into how senior and early career scientists can work together effectively to produce high-quality peer reviews, enhancing the overall scientific publishing process.
Co-Reviewing in Scientific Publications: Benefits and Challenges - AGU Webinar
Overview
Syllabus
A Discussion on Co-Reviewing for Peer Review Week 2021
What is the difference between the regular review process and co-reviewing?
How is learning from the co-reviewing process different from what you do in the classroom?
What is the benefit for authors who receive co-reviews?
Have you faced any challenges during the co-reviewing process?
Why would you recommend those watching this webinar participate in the co-reviewing process?
Do you have any other thoughts on co-reviewing you would like to share?
Taught by
AGU
Related Courses
-
How to Write Effective Reviews and Improve Your Own Manuscript
4.0 -
Research Article Writing & Publications - From Draft to Article - Processing Steps
-
Peer Review Week Panel Discussion: Openness vs. Confidentiality in Scientific Publishing
-
More than a Manuscript - Guidance on Publishing in Scientific Journals
