Overview
Explore the concept of constructive disagreement in American civic life through this thought-provoking panel discussion from The Aspen Institute. Delve into the idea that the United States needs more intelligent and historically-rooted arguments rather than fewer debates. Examine fundamental tensions in American democracy, including liberty vs. equality and national vs. local control. Learn about the Better Arguments project and its approach to fostering more productive civic discourse. Hear insights from experts Ramesh Ponnuru, Eric Liu, Rob Reich, Deborah Tannen, and Michelle De La Isla as they discuss the challenges of public arguments, informal fallacies, and the importance of constructive discomfort in dialogue. Gain practical tips for improving your own argumentation skills and contributing to a more nuanced national conversation.
Syllabus
Introduction
The New Normal
A Rush to Reconciliation
Less Stupid Arguments
The Better Arguments Project
The Challenge
The Question
Mic Runners
What makes a bad argument
Meet Kaya
Constructive Discomfort
Intimidation
Bad Argument
Uncomfortable
Informal fallacies
Historians fallacies
Wisdom of the room
Christian Alexander
Robert Rosencrantz
Chris Gates
James Marco
Terry Warren
Panel Introductions
Public Arguments
Dominique White
Taught by
The Aspen Institute