Completed
no input into registry policies
Class Central Classrooms beta
YouTube videos curated by Class Central.
Classroom Contents
The Economics of Open Source
Automatically move to the next video in the Classroom when playback concludes
- 1 Intro
- 2 The economics of package management
- 3 you are in this story
- 4 open-source doesn't mean open ownership or control
- 5 the package registry is centralized
- 6 centralization has advantages
- 7 centralization of costs
- 8 servers cost money who pays for them?
- 9 founding a company was a novel choice
- 10 those large numbers sure are large
- 11 open source generates a lot of value
- 12 open source vs free software
- 13 capitalism loves open source
- 14 the language spec
- 15 our common registry of shared code is owned by a private company
- 16 what are the consequences of private control?
- 17 no input into registry policies
- 18 the registry is what matters not the clients
- 19 the management of our commons is opaque to us
- 20 there is no trust without accountability
- 21 you had no way to hold me accountable
- 22 so is npm evil? mu. ask a different question.
- 23 npm is a financial instrument
- 24 npm Inc is a means for turning some money into more money
- 25 It's 2018. Packages flow like water.
- 26 packages cost money even if you're not paying for them
- 27 make money or raise money by telling a story about spending money to make money
- 28 imagine npm run by a non-benevolent entity
- 29 I agree with Ryan Dahl
- 30 entropic a federated package manager
- 31 new cli & new api decentralized: many registries
