Stanford Seminar - Partisan Gerrymandering and the Supreme Court: The Role of Social Science

Stanford Seminar - Partisan Gerrymandering and the Supreme Court: The Role of Social Science

Stanford Online via YouTube Direct link

An Opening for Social Science

9 of 37

9 of 37

An Opening for Social Science

Class Central Classrooms beta

YouTube videos curated by Class Central.

Classroom Contents

Stanford Seminar - Partisan Gerrymandering and the Supreme Court: The Role of Social Science

Automatically move to the next video in the Classroom when playback concludes

  1. 1 Introduction
  2. 2 Outline
  3. 3 Davis V Bandemer
  4. 4 What followed
  5. 5 Vieth v Biller
  6. 6 LULAC v Perry
  7. 7 Political Parties
  8. 8 The Basic Problem
  9. 9 An Opening for Social Science
  10. 10 A Challenge for the Courts
  11. 11 Symmetry
  12. 12 The Counterfactual
  13. 13 The drunkards search
  14. 14 Thresholds
  15. 15 Kennedys concerns
  16. 16 Symmetry standard
  17. 17 Efficiency gap
  18. 18 Advantages of the efficiency gap
  19. 19 Bias and media indifference
  20. 20 When is too much
  21. 21 Advantages
  22. 22 Unhappy surprises
  23. 23 The efficiency gap
  24. 24 Blowout phenomenon
  25. 25 Computer simulations
  26. 26 Political neutrality
  27. 27 Where did this all get us
  28. 28 Background of the case
  29. 29 Results of the case
  30. 30 The plaintiffs expert witness
  31. 31 Results of simulations
  32. 32 Culture clash
  33. 33 Roberts manonthestreet
  34. 34 Where do we go next
  35. 35 Will there be a winning metric
  36. 36 Other reform efforts
  37. 37 Counterfactuals

Never Stop Learning.

Get personalized course recommendations, track subjects and courses with reminders, and more.

Someone learning on their laptop while sitting on the floor.