Why Should Q=P in the Wasserstein Distance Between Persistence Diagrams?

Why Should Q=P in the Wasserstein Distance Between Persistence Diagrams?

Applied Algebraic Topology Network via YouTube Direct link

Candidates for the Median

18 of 21

18 of 21

Candidates for the Median

Class Central Classrooms beta

YouTube videos curated by Class Central.

Classroom Contents

Why Should Q=P in the Wasserstein Distance Between Persistence Diagrams?

Automatically move to the next video in the Classroom when playback concludes

  1. 1 Intro
  2. 2 Matchings between diagrams
  3. 3 Bottleneck distance distance
  4. 4 The main contenders
  5. 5 Coordinates have separate meanings
  6. 6 An example with height functions
  7. 7 An example with point clouds
  8. 8 Recall: Sublevel sets of functions on simplicial complexes
  9. 9 Local Stability for functions on simplicial complexes
  10. 10 Interleaving distance
  11. 11 The p-norm of a persistence module
  12. 12 Morphisms between persistence diagrams
  13. 13 Example with persistence modules of a single interval
  14. 14 Constructing a span from a matching
  15. 15 Spans for the bottleneck distance - matching the diagonal
  16. 16 Mean as minimiser of sum of distances squared
  17. 17 Candidates for the Mean
  18. 18 Candidates for the Median
  19. 19 Median of a selection - q=p=1
  20. 20 A case for change - replace
  21. 21 Lipschitz stability corollaries

Never Stop Learning.

Get personalized course recommendations, track subjects and courses with reminders, and more.

Someone learning on their laptop while sitting on the floor.